Should GPIF shift some assets into active strategies?
The Japanese pension fund’s actively managed foreign-equity investments outperformed the far larger amounts being managed passively. Should it take active investing more seriously?
Government Pension Investment Fund’s (GPIF) investment return might have fallen less in the last fiscal year had it deployed active strategies for its foreign equities. But this relative performance alone may not be enough to convince the pension fund to shift some of its mostly passively managed assets back into active management.
Sign in to read on!
Registered users get 2 free articles in 30 days.
Subscribers have full unlimited access to AsianInvestor
Not signed up? New users get 2 free articles per month, plus a 7-day unlimited free trial.
¬ Haymarket Media Limited. All rights reserved.